.
.
.
1. GOP refuses to extend unemployment benefits unless cuts are made elsewhere to pay for them.
i.e., Congress requires an additional source of revenue to support jobless.
2. GOP insists tax cuts be extended permanently for those earning $250k+/yr.
i.e., Congress sacrifices an additional source of revenue to support wealthiest.
how does the GOP reconcile the fundamental contradiction of these two positions? if i've oversimplified or misrepresented, please correct me.
.
.
.
2 comments:
You need more followers. These reports are too well-written and insightful to go unnoticed.
I'm not big on taxes.
Post a Comment